SECTION C: ASPECTS OF SCHOLARLY TEACHING

(iv) Method of Evaluating

 

Aim 4:

Become aware of the variety of ways evaluation methods are employed and justified within your own disciplinary setting and examine their consistency with a student learning perspective.
Topic 4/Task:

Undertake an inspection and appraisal of methods of evaluating teaching in your own institution, using checkpoints from Ramsden's Chapter 11. These are (you may add others as you find them) ---

  • Control: who controls the process, the data, the usage? (pp217-218) Is evaluation done ON you by others or BY YOU for yourself or BY YOU for others?
  • The point of it? (pp219-221). To what extent does undergoing or undertaking each particular kind of evaluation address the question "What do teachers concerned for student learning really want, and need, to know about themselves?"
  • Range and particularity: (221-223). Is it intended to provide information about groups or individuals? teaching or programs?
  • Managerial: (224-229) To what extent does it comply with or serve the function of performance appraisal for managerial purposes?
  • Student rating: (229-233) To what extent does it depend upon, or is it dominated by, student ratings? And how valid are the instruments used for that likely to be? What other measures are used besides ratings?
  • Minimal/duties-based?: (233-236) To what extent is it concerned with setting minimal standards which all staff are expected to attain as part of their contract obligations (duties); if it goes beyond that, where do these higher standards inherent in the evaluation come from?
  • Institutional appraisal: Is the CEQ or some similar scale involved at some point as an institutional measure? (236-239). If so, what use is made of the results as feedback to departments? In what way does the CEQ's use either enhance or detract from the development of collegiality and trust?
  • Finally test each method or instrument or scheme in use against Ramsden's nine points (241) and find out which ones are superior on that scale of comparison. Compare outcomes with others in your group who are considering similar instruments or schemes to yours.

When you have interrogated the evaluation methods in use in your institution, re-consider the case studies Ramsden offers (242-246) and choose from Ramsden's cases one method you are not at present using, or not at present available to you, and appraise its suitability for possible use in one of your courses or for some aspect of your teaching.

 


Previous Aim  Section C Menu List of Aims: Section C (iv)  Next Aim